Do you believe journalism has become voyeuristic ?
Voyeur
·
a person who gains sexual pleasure from
watching others when they are naked or engaged in sexual activity:he stood
transfixed, a voyeur feasting on the swell of her buttocks
·
a person who enjoys seeing the pain or
distress of others:a voyeur of deathmurder trials make us voyeurs
Voyeuristic – Adjective
I don’t believe journalism has become voyeuristic. To claim journalism has become voyeuristic implies
the journalists to be voyeurs and that journalists were not always voyeurs. We do not say a peeping tom was being
journalistic, so why would we say journalists are being voyeuristic.
Journalists have a job to find a new angle, and to have new
information before someone else. To do
this journalists become intrusive and push boundaries, or even over step
boundaries.
Certainly journalism is intrusive, but people will read,
watch, or listen to what they want. Journalists
are just providing information, people will choose what they want to do with
that information. In the “news of the world” saga, phone hacking was a
technique to obtain information not the act of watching for enjoyment of the
demise of others. It was illegal and immoral, but a far cry from voyeurism. I
guess it’s actions like this that cause others to put a more sordid spin on it
by people who wouldn’t or have gone that far to separate intrusive journalism
from very intrusive journalism.
Journalism has always been intrusive, but the increase in
the ways information can be gained and transmitted, has also increased the
volume, and depth, of information being accessible to the audience. News no
longer has to be selective, people don’t have to wait a day, a week, or a
month, for the next update, or to find out what is new. It is now a case of
what is happening right now, so yes there is the aspect of watching to see
watch happens, but it’s not for self-enjoyment, the only intent is to have that
information first to distribute.
Minute by minute news updates does not mean the journalist
is being voyeuristic but merely doing their job. They are simply providing information to
which the people can choose to pay attention to, or disregard. If we bastardise
words to the point where they no longer hold the original meaning then can’t we
all be labelled something we are not and our actions be seen as something more
sinister then they are.
No comments:
Post a Comment